dundas1903
Lead
Offline
Curling Club: Reform
Posts: 17
|
 |
« on: November 23, 2009, 07:53:10 PM » |
|
What a shambles this now looks like - draw made today with 3 sections of 5 teams and how do you qualify. If you are in Section B & C then top 2 teams If you are in Section A ten top 3 teams How can that possibly be fair - surely top 2 in each section then third placed teams must play off for the remaining spot. Surely the RCCC must give an explanation of how they came to this way of conducting things
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Devils Advocate
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: November 23, 2009, 09:31:56 PM » |
|
yes another c-up by the competitions management !
i notice from the RCCC website that on Friday that 6 teams were to qualify directly to the finals from the minitour and by Monday it had risen to 7 !
They have to state at the outset (back in June) the number of teams that are to qualify through the minitour - it was the same last year when it was intimated that it would be 3 teams and it ended up 7 or 8 teams. they seem to make it up as they go along !
No wonder that a board / asc member now has to be present when the draws are made.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Sandy Morton 1
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: November 23, 2009, 10:23:02 PM » |
|
I would hope that a person from this forum could be invited to participate in any draws. We seem to have the most hope for Scottish Curling. We also seem to have some very sensible people.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
gordy
Lead
Offline
Curling Club: Dunkeld
Posts: 5
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: November 23, 2009, 11:27:56 PM » |
|
This year must be one of the most shambolic Scottish Championships on record, and it has'nt even started yet! The rules of mini-tour states that "at the moment the top 6 ranked" teams will qualify for the Scottish", how come today they have 8 listed as qualifying? 3 sections of 5 in the pre-qualifying, 3 to come out of Section A and 2 from B & C, level playing field? Who dreams this stuff up? Scottish finals, play round robin, then if you make last 4 just come back 5 weeks later for the page playoff!! allegedly to satisfy TV, tell TV that if all they can give us is a Tues and Wed night at midnight to take a running jump. Do they pay us or vice-versa? could someone expand on this? Whatever teams win the junior championships cannot play the latter stages of the Scottish if they get there because World finals clash, fair chance of this happening given the number of juniors playing esp in the girls. If this happens will they have their entry fee and all their expenses refunded? Will they take the teams who finish 5th if this happens? even tho the rules state top 4.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Robin Copland
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: November 24, 2009, 09:02:23 AM » |
|
The rules of mini-tour states that "at the moment the top 6 ranked" teams will qualify for the Scottish" The words "at the moment" were presumably put there to give the organisers some wriggle room - the devil's in that particular little detail. As for the rest of Gordy's post, I concur. Glad I'm not competing this year. .
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Devils Advocate
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: November 24, 2009, 10:14:52 AM » |
|
The rules of mini-tour states that "at the moment the top 6 ranked" teams will qualify for the Scottish" The words "at the moment" were presumably put there to give the organisers some wriggle room - the devil's in that particular little detail. As for the rest of Gordy's post, I concur. Glad I'm not competing this year. . Thats the point - what do they need "wiggle" room for? To make it easy for organisers to have a draw that suits them ? To make sure certain teams dont have the ignominy of having to play pre-qualifiers? To make sure that the minitour gets entries? and they still cock it up! Should be simple - 1)top 4 "qualifying" teams (ie meet the scottish mens criteria) get to go straight to mens qualifier from the minitour. 2)Rest will have to go through pre-qualifier. 3) This is stated categorically at time of issue of entry forms for both the mini tour and scottish mens. How difficult is this?   None of this - well it might be 3 , it might be 6 , but actually we will take 8 teams - what a farce!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
JohnMinnaar
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: November 24, 2009, 11:08:06 AM » |
|
None of this - well it might be 3 , it might be 6 , but actually we will take 8 teams - what a farce!
This sounds very much like the costs of the proposed NCA!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
fermerfaefife
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: November 24, 2009, 11:09:22 AM » |
|
You will not see my name in the draw this year - competed for god knows how long and have to admit to being pretty disillousioned with it and thus didnt enter.
I concur with Gordy completely - the thing is so broken up before and after xmas with loads on before xmas if you wanted to play them all. really all that is on after perth masters is one weekend of mens qualifiers and the (split) finals.
i know the Olympics come into play - but there are the rest of the teams to think about. It actually might have been an opportunity to give somebody else a shot if murdoch et al were tied up with the Olympics.
i can also understand DA's frustration with the minitour - I looked up last years scottish mens entry form and it was stated that 3 teams would qualify out of the minitour - and they ended up taking 7 i think. It was fairly obvious this was done last year to give equal sections and an easy to work draw at the pre-qualifiers. The issue with Logan Gray & Pete also didnt help with the other competitors - many comments by them on that one.
the same debacle that happened in this years womens qualifiers also happened 3 or 4 years ago in the mens at Pitlochry - A weekends curling to kick out a couple of teams - you would think RCCC would learn.
At the time of the last "consultation" on the structure of the mens 2 or 3 years ago - i suggested to CH to hold a skips meeting at one of the qualifiers in Perth when all sections were playing there. this would have been an open discussion with the twenty odd skips present - he never bothered and after some emailed ideas did his own thing anyway.
There needs to be some changes made, as patently the thing isnt working as it is.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bobby
Lead
Offline
Curling Club: Stewarton heather
Posts: 5
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: November 24, 2009, 06:22:39 PM » |
|
There are so many things wrong with the qualification process for the Scottish and it is going to have a major impact in the numbers who enter next years Scottish I believe.The concept of the mini-tour is good however the number of qualifiers to the playdowns should be set before a stone is flung,surely the competition convenor knows by this point entry numbers and teams that have already pre-qualified for the playdowns from the previous years scottish.Luckily I avoided the pre-qualifiers but who makes the draw up,Colin Hamilton? How this can be a fair way of doing it I don't know.Can we not just go back to 2 groups of 14 at the playdowns or is that too easy?Finally,Gordy is right the scottish is too fragmented now,ok have 1 district before Xmas but the finals are going to be ruined with the split after the round robin.Surely they can fit it in somewhere in the calender.Is Mr Hamilton the only person who makes these decisions or is it a commitee?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Sandy Morton
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: November 24, 2009, 06:26:45 PM » |
|
From the last Board minutes
One matter raised at ASC relating to event draws has been dealt with at the subsequent Events meeting, the idea of have a member of the committee supporting Colin Hamilton at each event was thought to have merit .
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dunoonrock
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: November 25, 2009, 06:24:20 PM » |
|
In the past 20 years or so ago the Scottish started with Ice ring playdowns. If you qualified you went to Districts and then qualified to the week of the Scottish Championships. The luck was coming out an Ice rink with poor teams. Hard to come out of Perth and Hamilton, so some looked for easy venues.
I must say this year I read the RCCC website report. Saw a team had done well but it did not feature any way near the qualifying mark. Got totally confused (.com but it did not help either)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dundas1903
Lead
Offline
Curling Club: Reform
Posts: 17
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: November 25, 2009, 08:48:30 PM » |
|
RCCC have changed their minds again - now just two from each section - guess that makes it easier. Just to have a team less going through to the Districts.
Make the rules up as they go along - watch this space it is all bound to change again !
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
runit
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: November 25, 2009, 10:45:55 PM » |
|
aaaaah, those RCCC'ers are funny lads. Getting all of you all worked up then making it all ok again.
They definitely ment to do that. Well played RCCC, well played.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Devils Advocate
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: November 26, 2009, 08:40:12 AM » |
|
so if one team less to districts that means there will be a section of 9 and a section of 10 - another rammy to come i fear.
Why does it take the punters (us) to point out the shortcomings - i thought the (allegedly) clever people at cairnie got paid to run the game properly these days?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
strathydoug
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: November 26, 2009, 08:40:45 PM » |
|
Anyone know when then 2010/11 mens application form will be available? I can't wait to enter 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Regards
Doug
|
|
|
|
|
|