whats going on?
Well now, what's new, you might say. The loser blaming the "ice conditions"?
I wasn't there, and I have no feedback from anyone throughout the week. What I say now is my own observation and experience. There are three main reasons why a sheet of ice should play as described, and why many stones through the week have "wrecked", or clipped guards, or behaved erratically.
One: the ice surface itself. The technicians in charge of this, Mark Shurek and Scott Henderson, are experienced, extremely competent and well respected. For them to produce an ice surface that is not consistent, level and at optimum temperature is not really an option. In my own experience it is quite difficult to create an ice surface that should cause stones to behave in this way, so we can safely rule out the ice surface as provided by the technicians.
Two: the pipework below the ice. The Linx was refurbished, but I do not believe the floor was replaced. If it has been replaced, the pipework will have been installed with laser technology and will be superior to what had been there before, so rule that out. If it is still fitted with the original pipes, it is possible that these are not level and that there can be runs, where one pipe can be deeper than others and the ice surface therefore marginally warmer. This can cause the problem described, but the fact is that players of this standard will read it very quickly and everyone will know about it after a day or two. No evidence of this has been offered, so rule that out too, but not completely.
Three: the stones, or the running bands of the stones, both width and texture. Over the past few years there has been much debate over the sanding of stones, where the texture of the running bands is changed by the use of sand paper. I am against this practice, as it is expensive, unpredictable and unnecessary, whilst others have been determined to push the cause. Yes, it does work, but it is an imprecise science at the very best. This imprecise science can even be found on YouTube, where two guys demonstrate how to do it, or rather how not to do it, because they weren't doing it very well. If the sanding is done by an expert, such as the manufacturer and his best worker, all new stones are delivered with such a finish that is reasonably consistent and perfectly playable. For the use of stones in an arena environment it is common to provide stones with a finish specified by the technician in charge, or the agent working for the ECF, to enable the stones to curl well. Such stones will usually be "played in" somewhere before the competition, but not always.
So, if a set of stones is newly sanded, the finish will last for a few weeks and gradually mature into a reasonable consistency. They will not be matched into pairs or sets and will not mature evenly, and during that period anything can happen.
I have no information on the stones used in Aberdeen, but that is where I would look for the problems. It is just possible that sanded stones will become a thing of the past, with a set of stones allowed to naturally mature and matched into pairs and sets that can be played with confidence. Until then the players will blame the ice.